1994: The American Psychiatric Association
There is no published scientific evidence
supporting the efficacy of 'reparative therapy' as a treatment to change ones
sexual orientation. It is not described in the scientific literature. There are
a few reports in the literature of efforts to use psychotherapeutic and
counselling techniques to treat persons troubled by their homosexuality who
desire to become heterosexual; however, results have not been conclusive, nor
have they been replicated. There is no evidence that any treatment can change a
homosexual person's deep seated sexual feelings for others of the same sex.
1997: The American Psychological Association
President said……"In the past 10 years, Christian
fundamentalists have enlisted a coalition of old-style psychologists,
psychiatrists and social workers who have become very visible in this
country and internationally, and who have as a mission to 'help' homosexuals
get rid of their sexual orientation... Our aim is not to try to stop them
per se or interfere with anyone's right to practice [therapy] but we want
to expose the social context that creates this market."
1997 The American Psychological Association
Resolution
APA officials are concerned that some who enter
therapy are being coerced by their families, employers, church members etc.
Therefore the APA resolution asks that the therapist obtains "informed
consent" from the client. This includes:
- a
full discussion of the client's potential for happiness as a homosexual,
- communication
to the client that there is no sound scientific evidence that the therapy
works,
- raising
the possibility that therapy may exacerbate the client's problems, and
- an
analysis of the client's true motivation for wanting to change.
1999 the American Psychiatric Association
"The potential risks of 'reparative therapy'
are great, including depression, anxiety and self-destructive behaviour, since
therapist alignment with societal prejudices against homosexuality may
reinforce self-hatred already experienced by the patient. Many patients who
have undergone 'reparative therapy' relate that they were inaccurately told
that homosexuals are lonely, unhappy individuals who never achieve acceptance
or satisfaction. The possibility that the person might achieve happiness and
satisfying interpersonal relationships as a gay man or lesbian is not
presented, nor are alternative approaches to dealing with the effects of
societal stigmatization discussed."
"Therefore, the American Psychiatric
Association opposes any psychiatric treatment, such as 'reparative' or
'conversion' therapy which is based upon the assumption that homosexuality
per se is a mental disorder or based upon a prior assumption that the patient
should change his/her homosexual orientation.”
1999 the American Psychiatric Association
Board of Trustees "endorsed a position
statement at its December meeting that opposes therapeutic techniques
some psychiatrists and mental health professionals claim can shift an
individual's sexual orientation from homosexual to heterosexual. The Board
also acknowledged that there is no evidence that these so-called
'reparative therapies' have any efficacy in converting someone from one sexual
orientation to another." The statement points out that "potential
risks of 'reparative therapy' are great, including depression, anxiety,
and self-destructive behaviour, since therapist alignment with societal
prejudices against homosexuality may reinforce self-hatred already experienced
by a patient.”
1999 The
American Academy of Paediatrics, American Counselling Association, American
Association of School Administrators, American Federation of Teachers, American
Psychological Association, American School Health Association, Interfaith
Alliance Foundation, National Association of School Psychologists, National
Association of Social Workers, and National Education Association
formed the "Just the Facts Coalition." They developed and endorsed "Just
the Facts About Sexual Orientation & Youth: A Primer for Principals,
Educators and School Personnel" which stated:
The most important fact about 'reparative therapy,'
also sometimes known as 'conversion' therapy, is that it is based on an
understanding of homosexuality that has been rejected by all the major health
and mental health professions. The American Academy of Paediatrics, the
American Counselling Association, the American Psychiatric Association, the
American Psychological Association, the National Association of School Psychologists,
and the National Association of Social Workers, together representing more than
477,000 health and mental health professionals, have all taken the
position that homosexuality is not a mental disorder and thus there is no
need for a 'cure’. Health and mental health professional organizations
do not support efforts to change young people's sexual orientation through
'reparative therapy' and have raised serious concerns about its potential to do
harm."
2000 Australian Psychological Society
Position Statement on the Use of Therapies that Attempt to Change Sexual
Orientation
In the past, defining homosexuality as an illness
buttressed society's dislike for same-sex relationships. In the current social
climate, claiming homosexuality is a mental disorder stems from efforts to
discredit the growing social acceptance of homosexuality as a normal variant of
human sexuality. Consequently, the issue of changing sexual orientation has
become highly politicised. The debates surrounding this issue have obscured the
scientific data by calling into question the motives and the character of
individuals on both sides of the issue.
The validity, efficacy and ethics of clinical
attempts to change an individual’s sexual orientation have been challenged. To
date, there are no scientifically rigorous outcome studies to determine either
the actual efficacy or harm of therapies or treatments that attempt to change a
person’s sexual orientation. There are sparse scientific data about selection
criteria, risks versus benefits of the treatment, and long-term outcomes of
such therapies. The literature consists of anecdotal reports of individuals who
have claimed to change, people who claim that attempts to change were harmful
to them, and others who claimed to have changed and then later recanted those
claims.
With little data about patients, it is impossible to evaluate the theories,
which rationalise the conduct of ‘reparative’ or conversion therapies. Firstly,
they are at odds with the scientific position of the American Psychiatric
Association, which has maintained, since 1973, that homosexuality per se is not
a mental disorder. The theories of ‘reparative’ therapists define homosexuality
as either a developmental arrest, a severe form of psychopathology, or some
combination of both. In recent years, noted practitioners of ‘reparative
therapy’ have openly integrated older psychoanalytic theories that pathologise
homosexuality with traditional religious beliefs condemning homosexuality.
The earliest scientific criticisms of the early theories and religious beliefs
informing ‘reparative’ or conversion therapies came primarily from sexology
researchers. Later, criticisms emerged from psychoanalytic sources as well.
There has also been an increasing body of religious thought arguing against
traditional, biblical interpretations that condemn homosexuality and which
underlie religious types of ‘reparative’ therapy.
Recommendations:
1. APS supports the APA 1973 position that homosexuality is not a diagnosable
mental disorder.
2. As a general principle, a therapist should not determine the goal of
treatment either coercively or through subtle influence. Psychotherapeutic
modalities to convert or ‘repair’ homosexuality are based on developmental
theories the scientific validity of which is questionable. Furthermore,
anecdotal reports of ‘cures’ are counterbalanced by anecdotal claims of
psychological harm. ‘Reparative’ therapists have not produced any rigorous
scientific research to substantiate their claims of cure. Until there is such
research available, APS recommends that ethical practitioners refrain from
attempts to change individuals’ sexual orientation.
3. The ‘reparative’ therapy literature uses theories that make it difficult to
formulate scientific selection criteria for their treatment modality. This
literature not only ignores the impact of social stigma in motivating efforts
to cure homosexuality, it is a literature that actively stigmatises
homosexuality as well. ‘Reparative’ therapy literature also tends to overstate
the treatment’s accomplishments while neglecting any potential risks to
patients. APS encourages and supports research in the academic research
community to determine further the efficacy or otherwise of therapies or
treatments that attempt to change a person’s sexual orientation.
2010 Royal
Australian & New Zealand College of Psychiatrists Position Statement
The American Psychological Association published a
report of a study that reviewed the results of 83 studies carried out
between 1960 and 2007 on the controversial concept of Sexual Orientation
Change Efforts (SOCE). The report found that, contrary to the claims of SOCE
practitioners and advocates, recent research demonstrates that there is no
sound scientific evidence that sexual orientation can be changed. The harm
such therapies can cause to individuals, the contribution they make to the
misrepresentation of homosexuality as a mental disorder, and the prejudice and
discrimination that can flourish through the use of such therapies has led all
major medical organisations to oppose the use of sexual reorientation
therapies.
Recommendations
•
The RANZCP does not support the use of sexual
orientation change efforts of any kind
•
Mental health workers should avoid
misrepresenting the efficacy of sexual orientation change efforts when
providing assistance to people distressed by their own or others’ sexual
orientation
•
Mental health workers should assist people
distressed by their sexual orientation by care and treatment approaches that involve
acceptance, support, and identity exploration. These should aim to reduce
the stigma associated with homosexuality and respect the person’s religious
beliefs.
Labels: ex-gay, reparative therapy